User talk:Jhenderson777

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Wikipedia-logo-en-flag.gif

What's on your mind?

User:Jhenderson777
User talk:Jhenderson777
User:Jhenderson777/My sandbox
Special:Prefixindex/User:Jhenderson777
User:Jhenderson777/Userboxes
Special:Contributions/Jhenderson777
User:Jhenderson777/DYK
Home

Talk Page

Sandbox

Site Map

Userboxes

Contributions

DYK

Looking back at the start of my edits this year to the beginning:
Note regarding alternate account:This is a history of my older account. Since I was new. I was warned on stuff the editors didn't know why I was doing it. One warning of fraud date signing. I just didn't know how to sign. Also I was accused of making unconstructive edits on a navbox I was creating. It was just me removing my unfigured out goofs I made. Along with other stuff I didn't understand yet regarding User:J Greb.
Additional comments:Me being embarrassed is why I switched to this account but I later realized that I was slow on learning and that should be accepted as ok. Nothing against Wikipedia:Sock puppetry what tells not to do though. I was also younger too. It took me forever knowing that you should move a certain way just in this account alone. So I still facepalm of a lot of my edits in this account regarding moving. So if I do another edit that is wrong now per guideline. Please assume good faith. There is a lot of guidelines out there that I maybe missed.
IP related information: In the past I started out as a IP editor. I wouldn't know which one. I didn't remember how old I was. I do believe I was a teenager. All I remember is I added villains on the Teen Titans navbox that still there. I know I was responsible for adding villains on the Justice League navbox as well. I think this is it. I was just learning and I am sure I made a lot of mistakes. I don't use ANY IP anymore. I never did a unconstructive or a unserious edit on purpose in my IP contributions (except for a one where I reverted myself [as planned] in this account a long time ago. [RIP on a film series statement on a article that I contribute heavily on Update: Found it. I fastly reverted myself in good faith.] That's a one time thing though.) Although I never use IP accounts no more. I am thankful for it though because it made me realize I wanted to take part. So no I am not negative of allowing IP's to edit. I just prefer them to sign in once they like Wikipedia and do constructive edits.
Blocks: Nah I never got blocked! Except on accident somehow. It wasn't aimed at me though. So we good. One helpful thing is I am cautious at editing and good-natured on conversation. I do like to be bold though.
Conflicts with other editors:I try not to disgree with a lot editors. I do recall having disagreements though. User:J Greb and me get along swimmingly on the navbox related discussions. Not! But still I try to as much as I can and I still regard him as a colleague. My most heated debate was on Talk:Glenn Beck and I should have been more careful with what I said. A user there was in a fighting mood. lol. He was blocked now and loves to talk smack about this site thanks to me and other editors on his blog. The only thing I am sure is that he was a liberal.
User:Tenebrae, User:MichaelQSchmidt (Main article), User: Darkwarriorblake, User:TriiipleThreat, User: Erik and User:Rusted AutoParts and User talk:Betty Logan, User: Nightscream etc. have become like family to me while editing Wikipedia. Definitely thanks to WikiProjects. Some I try to put in line while some do vice versa. Sticking together for things that we like and relate to is a good thing about this site. I also like to meet other respectful editors as well. If I talked on your page before. Chances are you are on my watchlist automatically. I designed it that way.
The Future: In the future I do want to be a administrator if I am still active. Although that is the question. Will I stay active. I just know Wikipedia shouldn't be the only thing to focus on outside of real life. Would I be a good and responsible one? Yes I know I would...but it will be up to a lot of other editors too that is going to judge my past Wiki sins as a younger editor compared to how good I am now and how I could be at for the future. Which I won't be a fan of. But I got to get ready for it anyways. But I know I have what it takes if that's the mission that I am going to take. Although I don't edit for that goal. I edit because I like it...just like I first knew about it because I liked to read it. I am a reader and a writer...and Wikipedia make me realize that. (Even though I suck at punctuation.) Now being administrator worthy is of course going to be a goal now that it is being 2014. Along with making articles GA and FA when I can. Along with rollbacking vandalizers if I am really bored. Maybe even creating more articles and navboxes. Along with downloading images. Also with discussing whatever. So wish me luck in the future (whoever is reading this) on achieving these goals and being a Veteran editor 3!!!

Update log 22:13, 1 January 2014 (UTC): My goal today was make at least 14,000 edits in my contributions. I have succeeded and I am now going to take a break.

Update log 03:55, 8 January 2014 (UTC): Laid low today and is kind of burnt out of editing. Not to mention that I am trying to find times for writing novels too. This is complicating it. I still want to expand on my contributions again though for the future.

Contents

Yes... it may well be.... but it does need work first[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Jhenderson777. You have new messages at User talk:Jhenderson777/John Dies at the End (film).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Jhenderson777. You have new messages at User talk:Jhenderson777/John Dies at the End (film).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Reply[edit]

Sounds awesome. Rusted AutoParts (talk) 12:05 28 May 2011 (UTC)

The Lone Ranger[edit]

Hey, would you like to check out the film project article i just created? Please respond. Rusted AutoParts (talk) 21:26 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Merry Christmas[edit]

Merry Christmas[edit]

Christmas tree.svg Holiday Cheer
Fortdj33 talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This is just to celebrate the holiday season and promote WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer, by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings! - Chad

Opportunity[edit]

After reading you comment. I would like to learn how to become a better user on Wikipedia. - User:TreCoolGuy

Avengers Studio[edit]

I started a talk page on the 2012 in film page. About why Marvel Studios should be just credited for it not Disney. -- TreCoolGuy (talk) 1:31, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Avengers/Iron Man 3[edit]

Hello, I started a talk page discussion on the list of Paramount Pictures films page. About adding Avengers and Iron man 3 to the page. Thanks for reading this message and have a good day. – TreCoolGuy (talk) 3, March 2014 (UTC)

FOX Animated Universe[edit]

I have started a discussion on the talk page for the FOX Animated Universe to keep it. You can find the discussion right here. Thanks and have a good day. - TreCoolGuy (talk) 09 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of P.T. (demo)[edit]

The article P.T. (demo) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:P.T. (demo) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 06:41, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

July Spider-Man work[edit]

All of your edits yesterday and today on Spider-Man: WOW!! THANK YOU for all that you did. That was some serious improvement! Spidey104 17:58, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Wizard[edit]

Happy to help, Jh. Here are archive links for #61-70, #71-80, and #191-200 to start off with. There are links at the bottom of these pages for other numbers, and if you click around these archive pages you should be able to accumulated the rest. Happy hunting!

While I have you, perhaps I could ask you to go to the RfC at Talk:The Phantom and weigh in there. With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 01:24, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Well, let's gather as many as we can. The pattern seems to be that in the original URLs, the fourth number from the left after ".com" and the seventh number from the left after ".com" each go up one in tandem, and that each time they do so, they do it in a pair of URLs, one ending in "thgreatestcharacters.html" and the other ending in "thgreatestcharacters2.html." So "0514082" goes up to "0515083" and "0516084" etc. The URL for #181-190 seems an exception, and sometimes one or the other number goes up by two when the other goes up by one, and in the lower character numbers (below #40), it looks like the fifth character from the left goes up. After that, I can't quite figure out the pattern. Still, here's everything so far from #21-on:
--Tenebrae (talk) 01:57, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
So I did a Google search for [wizard "THE 200 GREATEST COMIC BOOK CHARACTERS OF ALL TIME" "20."], hoping it would get me a dead original link for whoever character #20 was, and I got a hit. (It was Ultron, by the way.) Doing an archive search on that gave me, ironically, #1-10 but not yet #11-20. I'm working on it.
  • #2-10
  • #1, and boy, was it a wrong choice. But each to one's own. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:17, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Whoops — didn't read your full post till now. I can't remember how I found the first one, though I imagine it was by running across an old Wikipedia footnote with the original URL and then searching for it at archive.org. Or, no, wait — now II'm jogging my memory, I may have found the original URL at an old forum posting online. Sometimes you get lucky with these old links. --Tenebrae (talk) 03:01, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

GameSpot Issue fixed[edit]

Hey, just to let you know, you can archive those GameSpot refs with complete safety now on both Archive.org and WebCite. But old archived links done during the time of the problem still suffer from that issue, so fresh archiving is needed. --ProtoDrake (talk) 14:51, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Midtown High School for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Midtown High School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midtown High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. МандичкаYO 😜 01:07, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Midtown High School-related[edit]

I have added some info to your sandbox with some references to some of the staff members. --Rtkat3 (talk) 00:58, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Oops[edit]

You messed up. You do NOT do moves like that while an AFD is in process. Schmidt, Michael Q. 01:33, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

@Jhenderson777: Update: I have moved the article with history BACK to mainspace. For now... work on it THERE. Patience, grasshopper... patience. Schmidt, Michael Q. 01:47, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
@Jhenderson777: AND you now have a copy I have placed in User:Jhenderson777/Midtown High School. What edits you do to one, do also to the other. Green tickY Schmidt, Michael Q. 02:02, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Midtown High School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spider-Man (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Other Spider-Man articles[edit]

I really like what you've done creating all of the articles lately of different versions of Spider-Man! It has definitely taken a lot of work and they look great. Life is very busy right now so I can't offer much help (I'll do what I can when I can), but I can offer words of encouragement to let you know your effort is noticed and appreciated. Spidey104 20:51, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Spider-Verse Spider-Men.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Spider-Verse Spider-Men.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Response[edit]

Satanus made a few appearances in Batman/Superman last year, you can look it up. Blaze appeared in a New 52 Supergirl story as well, she historically hasn't appeared in as many Superman-related titles as Satanus but it's irrelevant since both characters share a wikipedia page.

I am not overly impressed with the comments you left after reverting my edit on the navbox, which by itself didn't bother me as much since it would've been better if you had said nothing at all. Not only have you contradicted yourself on based on your past comments like being civil, deciding whether to add or remove character entries based on quantity of media adaptations (which btw, a lot of these characters even when adapted to other media did not even appear in Superman-centric stuff), I am also beginning to think you are spiting me deliberately.Haleth (talk) 16:27, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

A few characters off the top of my head who lack past appearances in Superman-centric media...Ultra Humanite? Atomic Skull as supervillain? But like Neutron, they all debuted as Superman villains and aren't canon immigrants like Darkseid which according to other editors should face stricter tests on how integral they are to the key concepts of the subject matter they have been imported into.

I think you missed what I said in the first sentence of the second paragraph. It wouldn't have bothered me much, if at all, if you had simply reverted without saying anything. I didn't go back and edit war again, did I? I tend to let things go if what I did REALLY bothers someone that much. I assume you probably realized that your comments were rude, which is why you decided to discuss it on my talk page. So I do appreciate that. Keep in mind that you have assumed bad faith probably as much as I did towards you, which is likely because we did a lot of edit warring in the past. And you refer to other editors being tough on you...well did he call your edits "pathetic", or made any other personal slights towards you in any way like implying that you are some crazed fan boy? It doesn't mean I get offended, but I am certainly less inclined to take you seriously.

I don't think it makes a whole lot of sense if it's all about media adaptations for the sake of it. If a Superman villain was used as some random Justice League villain without his or her connection to Superman being emphasized, then that shouldn't count especially when some of us have pushed for the strict and more exclusive nature of these navbox templates...it just means it's more likely that the character warrants a page on their own right. Just because a particular character doesn't have a lot of multimedia appearances, doesn't mean their presence in the comic book medium is to be dismissed.

So for example, Deathstroke have appeared in an animated Batman movie, a Batman animated series and two Batman video games so far, but that still doesn't qualify him as a Batman villain by your standards, am I right? By contrast, you also thought Doctor Death should have been included for the Batman navbox because of that milestone first appearance, and you started questioning whether I was biased or only into recent very comics after I reasoned that he is very obscure and hasn't really been used more in the Batman mythos over its 75+ years of history. I re-added him back to the navbox after thinking about the points you made. I'm not trying to open another can of worms, but comparing two different scenarios and the line of reasoning you are on.

And not everyone uses a mobile device to access wikipedia. Haleth (talk) 17:13, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

And again you are contradicting yourself. That is the complete opposite of the reasoning you gave in your comments when you reverted my edit: that Blaze and Satanus had no media adaptations. But they, like the other characters I mentioned earlier with little to no media presence, have established themselves as Superman villains in the comic book medium. And again, you're going "all bad faith" and passive aggressive on me after lecturing me to do the exact opposite in your last reply, now you are wondering out loud if you are going to "bother reading all of that" or insinuating that I will always "find an issue with how it works". Have you thought about the length of my reply was in response to you making three separate edits in a row on my talk page before I had the chance to response? Why bother having a discussion at all if you aren't going to make a sincere attempt to read what the other side has to say, or that you are already vocalizing feelings of contempt and being dismissive? Do you even understand what I am trying to convey to you? I am not re-opening the discussion regarding Deathstroke, I am comparing the stance you took with the stance you are taking now. The reasoning I am gathering from you now is that the only reason for your objection is the lack of media appearances.

Boomerang isn't a good comparison because he was part of an ensemble who starred as villain protagonists in Superior Foes of Spider-Man last year, and has in fact appeared in a lot more media then what you are suggesting. A character like Spot would be more appropriate given the comparable number of appearances and level of significance he has in Spider-Man's rogues gallery. Between Blaze and Satanus, both of them have four Elseworlds versions in addition to the standard Pre-Flashpoint and New 52 versions.

I am getting to a point where I just don't feel like a discussion with you is worth my time based on your attitude. Prove me wrong. Or maybe don't bother, and I will respond in kind. Haleth (talk) 18:03, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

GrandLeader's changes to Spider-Man template[edit]

GrandLeader has a history of making additions to the Spider-Man template that don't belong. His recent edit includes notes saying the characters should stay because discussion supports their inclusion. I cannot find any such discussion so I left a message on his talk page about it. I thought I'd let you know since you and I are the two editors who most often revert his edits. I figure we can give him a little bit of time to come up with a discussion before we revert the edits. Spidey104 16:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jessica Rabbit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Spider-Man-related[edit]

You are doing a good job making the pages for Spider-Gwen and Spider-Man Noir. If we start seeing more of Spider-UK during or after the Secret Wars storyline, do you think you can establish his page . Also, I have noticed that you have redirected Spider-X to the Alternate versions of Spider-Man page even though he is not an alternate version of Peter Parker. --Rtkat3 (talk) 19:43, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Spider-Man-related 2[edit]

If Spider-UK does become recurring in the Web Warriors, would you have his page created then like they did with Spider-Woman of Earth-65 and Spider-Man Noir. There is already a page for Spider-Ham. --Rtkat3 (talk) 21:57, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Men in Black (film series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page World Trade Center (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks much[edit]

Thanks for acknowledging my Quality improvement efforts at The Land of Gorch.

Much appreciated,

Cirt (talk) 03:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Looney Tunes-related[edit]

I heard you helped improve the List of Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies characters page by leaving links for the characters. I'd like to let you know that some of the links are redirecting to that page. If you would like to recreate their page, go right ahead. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Ai Apaec-related[edit]

It has come to my attention that you were the one who redirected Ai Apaec to the Alternate versions of Spider-Man page even though he only acted as Spider-Man when a part of the second incarnation of Norman Osborn's Dark Avengers just like how Mac Gargan's Venom appearance operated as Spider-Man in the first incarnation. I'm just wondering what the motive for that was. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

It may work in the incarnation area as he is one of the Dark Avengers Spider-Men. If any of the other surviving spider characters start making other appearances in the Web Warriors part, then perhaps they might get their own pages soon. The Peter Parker of Earth-1610 turned up alive alongside the Green Goblin of Earth-1610. After the defeat of the Green Goblin of Earth-1610, that reality's Peter Parker retired from being Spider-Man officially allowing Miles Morales to succeed him while he left New York with Mary Jane Watson. --Rtkat3 (talk) 20:35, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
When the other spider characters get notability like the Spider-Woman of Earth-65, then we can have their pages mage. --Rtkat3 (talk) 21:05, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Jhenderson777/Spider-Man (reboot)[edit]

Ambox warning orange.svg User:Jhenderson777/Spider-Man (reboot), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jhenderson777/Spider-Man (reboot) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jhenderson777/Spider-Man (reboot) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of incarnations of Spider-Man, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nightstalkers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Spider-man enemies[edit]

There is no indication on the rogues gallery list that the enemies should only include "major" characters. Why not include other notable characters which are also part of spider-man's rogue gallery? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrettWarr1 (talkcontribs) 20:30, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Superheroes[edit]

Superhero.png I love Superheroes!
Hey dude! How's it going? I see you are quite the expert on Superheroes! I love superheroes, keep up the good work! AnønʘmøưṨ 02:14, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Wikiclaus' cheer ![edit]

Wikiclaus.jpg Wikiclaus greetings
Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you the happiest of Wikiclaus' Wikipedian good cheer.
This message is intended to celebrate the holiday season, promote WikiCheer, and to hopefully make your day just a little bit better, for Wikiclaus encourages us all to spread smiles, fellowship, and seasonal good cheer by wishing others a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person.
Share the good feelings and the happiest of holiday spirits from Wikiclaus ! Christmas tree.svg Face-smile.svg Christmas tree.svg Face-smile.svg Christmas tree.svg Face-smile.svg Christmas tree.svg

Happy New Year, Jhenderson777![edit]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rogues Gallery[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:Rogues Gallery has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Soetermans. T / C 14:46, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Avengers[edit]

Iron max 2 (talk) 00:28, 31 January 2016 (UTC)The team has made a lot of enemies over the years that should be added to their navboxIron max 2 (talk) 00:28, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Spider-Man allies[edit]

Iron max 3 (talk Adding allies to his infobox that should not be removed, Iron max 3 (talk) 02:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Input requested[edit]

There is a dispute at Talk:Spider-Man and the X-Men over whether a redlink editor's edits violate WikiProject Comics guidelines as fancruft and issue-by-issue synopses. A comparison of two versions is here. I am writing to some longtime Project editors individually, since Portal talk:Comics appears to have very little traffic and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics/Notice board has had no postings in years. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Edge-of-spider-verse-1--100339.jpg[edit]

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Edge-of-spider-verse-1--100339.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Iron max 3 sock puppet?[edit]

Hi Jhenderson777,

I noticed your run-ins with Iron max 3 (talk · contribs). Is it just me, or does Omegariley53 (talk · contribs) have a very similar editing style and attitude? Iron max 3 has not been blocked, so I don't know if having multiple accounts at this point goes against the guidelines. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:37, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) It definitely seems like him which is a clear violation of WP:SOCK. It should also be noted that he has User:Iron max 2 as well, which I only warned him about because the names are so similar. But now that we think he is operating a completely different account, It should probably be brought up for review.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:17, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Actually, I starting to wonder if they all are socks of User:Rymax23, who has been blocked.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:24, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Judging by the topic and similar style of editing, it does appear to be so, yes. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 14:38, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Similar editing styles indeed. Along with similar interests. If they do happen to be the same person then he/ she is abusing multiple accounts and that is against the guideline that TriiipleThreat already mentioned. The editor should be blocked if so. We should totally put the accounts in review like I did with Rymax. Jhenderson 777 15:12, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
I reopened the investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rymax23.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:26, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Spider-Man Enemies rewrite[edit]

I'm not sure if you already know about this but considering you worked so hard to rewrite and maintain List of Spider-Man enemies (good work BTW), I thought you should know. Someone here has proposed another overhaul. I figured you would have an opinion on this. DarkKnight2149 00:38, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey I wanted to say I love the way you organized this page by villains debuting. I love this structure and is the most logical for a page like that and the best way to prevent other heroes villains from appearing on the list that aren't associated with them. I was wondering if you could apply it to other heroes' rogue galleries/enemies pages or teach me how to do it?

Fluffyroll11 (talk) 20:02, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

So with that being said I don't see how the Spider-Man villains page is incomplete but, could you do the same formatting to the Avengers enemies page? Also what do you think should it just be villains that debuted in the avengers or should each villain who appeared in an issue in order appear based off first appearance since Loki appears in issue number one but that wasn't his debut you know what I mean?

Fluffyroll11 (talk) 17:30, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Batman template[edit]

I wanted to understand your deletions from the Batman template. According to the article on Batman's supporting characters, Spoiler is part of the New 52 Batman Family, and so are Batwoman and Catwoman. Yet, you deleted them from the template, with the last two only from the public identity row. Also, if you don't want Batman, Inc within the Batman Family section, could they at least be in the supporting characters section?

Thanks, so trying to understand.--Coquidragon (talk) 23:29, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for replying. I see what you are saying, but then the template needs to be redesigned. Why having a code name section and a public identity section if you are only going to name the character once? It misses the point. By taking some names out to prevent the duplication you are talking about, then the lists become incomplete. I think both names should be there, whether you know the code name or the public name. That's how the NavBox was designed and that's what they are for, aren't they? As to the Batman, Inc. section, if there are no articles to some of them, we could at least list those who do have articles, can't we? Thanks again for looking into this.--Coquidragon (talk) 22:04, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Move of Phantom Eagle reverted.[edit]

Please do not move pages with incoming links without first establishing a consensus through Wikipedia:Requested moves. Please do not create WP:TWODABS disambiguation pages without first establishing the absence of a primary topic. Cheers! bd2412 T 17:42, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Response to message[edit]

Hey, thanks for the message. Were you talking about the BRD comment? NatGertler (IIRC) made that comment right after I patrolled it. Lib arts premed96 (talk) 02:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your recent copy-and-paste merges[edit]

...need to be redone. The way in which you've done it (as here) fails to comply with our licensing requirements. See WP:MERGETEXT for detailed instructions, with #2 and 4 in particular explaining what you need to fix. postdlf (talk) 20:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

DC Comics villains-related[edit]

My congratulations to you for having gotten the pages for recurring DC Comics villains Doctor Alchemy, Fiddler, Rainbow Raider, and Turtle reviewed. Especially since some of them appeared in The Flash. --Rtkat3 (talk) 14:46, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DarthBane-frontal.jpg[edit]

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:DarthBane-frontal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Neutral notice[edit]

This is a neutral notice of a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Comics#Request for Comment: Quotes and italics. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:57, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Comic Book Character infobox addition help request[edit]

Hey I wanted to make an addition to the comic book character info box template and was wondering if you could help me or point me in the right direction to make it happen? I wanted to add a relatives section to it since real people also have them on their info boxes so why why not comic book characters as well? What do you think? and how can I make it happen? Fluffyroll11 (talk) 23:26, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

@Jhenderson777: Hey what do you think of this idea? Also do you want to weigh in on it? I need like 1 or 2 more supporters to get it approved. Fluffyroll11 (talk) 15:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
@Jhenderson777: Yeah I already started the process you just need to comment on it on the Wikiproject comics talk page. Fluffyroll11 (talk) 16:58, 4 August 2016 (UTC)  :@Jhenderson777: Hey sorry to keep pestering you but, could you weigh in on this topic here?
@Jhenderson777: Hey so your a much more seasoned wikipedia user than myself so I was wondering if you could possibly tell me two things? Is there a way to solve those issue that may arise with the relatives field returning? And what is the purpose of the talk pages? Fluffyroll11 (talk) 14:35, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Avengers Enemy List[edit]

Hey since your a much more seasoned Wikipedia editor than myself want to work together in formatting the Avengers enemies list like you did to Spiderman's enemy list which is a rogues gallery list? The Avengers would be more challenging since they fight not just characters who debut in their comics but, ones from the rogues gallery of the ranks. So we would have to become more creative in how we note stuff and list it but, would essentially be like the way you did the Spider-Man enemies list page. So what do you say? Fluffyroll11 (talk) 15:18, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Spider-Gwen response[edit]

In your last edit summary about Spider-Gwen, you did say you were neutral if someone disagreed. I was planning on having to put in a section for the characters of Earth-65 outside of the Gwen Stacy of Earth-65 like the Bodega Bandit, a variation of the Yancy Street Gang, the organization S.I.L.K., and a female variation of Sam Wilson. If you would like to help with the brief information of the Earth-65 characters that don't have Earth-616 counterparts, you're welcome to help out. --Rtkat3 (talk) 02:53, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

I left a message on the talk page for Spider-Gwen if that is what you meant. --Rtkat3 (talk) 03:07, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Return to the Spider-Verse related[edit]

I was wondering if you have watched Ultimate Spider-Man where they just started showing the first of the four-part episode "Return to the Spider-Verse" which features some alternate Spider characters that never appeared in comics. If we were to modify the page that talks about the alternate spider characters like Spyder-Knight, a different type of Blood Spider from a Vampire-dominated world, Wolf Spider, Web Beard, and Webslinger the Spider-Cowboy as none of them appeared in the comics yet. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:29, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Miles Morales and Gwen Stacy[edit]

Thanks for the compliment, Jim. However, I don't read Spider-Gwen, and I cut back my editing drastically in April 2014. That, along with the 40 hour a week job I now have, makes large-scale additions of sourced material like the one you requested unlikely, at least from me. The thing is, the character hasn't been around that long, and hasn't made that many appearances, right? If your primary interest is creating a Powers and abilities section, and you have all her appearances (or are capable/willing to get them), you should be able to glean that info from the books. I'm sorry I can't be more help to you there. Nightscream (talk) 23:47, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Sorry. I got your confused with this guy. Good luck with the article! :) Nightscream (talk) 01:40, 6 September 2016 (UTC)