Talk:Palacký University Olomouc/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Moray An Par (talk) 14:39, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguate: Armoury, Dissolution, Joseph II, Simple majority.

Do not link Palacký University, Olomouc, it redirects back to this article.

Ref check: Ref 16 and 35 are redirects. Ref 29, 37, 33, 49, 44, 43, 45, 42, 46, 25, 55, 50, 48, 38, 8, 47, 64, 65, 66, 67 and 56 are dead. External links: List of the Rectors, Biomedicine For Regional Development and Human Resources, and Palacký University Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials are dead.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "1827 – 1860" should not have any space in between.

   Notable alumni section should be in prose. Consider expanding a separate List of Palacký University of Olomouc people.

   Do not link 1770

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Lead should be referenced.

   Most paragraphs do not have in-line citations.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   What's the info on the university's endowment and student government.

   The governance section is too detailed. Consider only mentioning important and remarkable facts.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   History section is too long/detailed. Consider condensing it. The university seems to have a very extensive history. Consider copy-pasting history section to History of Palacký University of Olomouc.

   See WP:UNIGUIDE. Current article has info on history, campus and alumni but none on academics and research. These two are very important. They need to be included in the article.

   You don't need to elaborate much on the types of universities (Governance section). They are trivial to this article.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Pictures are too big. Do not force image size per MOS.

   Consider finding a larger logo.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

This article has so many concerns that'll take very much time to resolve. I'm speedy failing this nomination. Consider reading WP:UNIGUIDE and looking at featured university articles before renominating. Moray An Par (talk) 15:08, 6 June 2011 (UTC)