Talk:Paul Ziert

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Gymnastics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gymnastics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gymnastics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GymnasticsWikipedia:WikiProject GymnasticsTemplate:WikiProject GymnasticsGymnastics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

tags from deb

1. Expansion tag says that sources are given for expansion (but none were given by the tagger). I could kvetch about why adding a tag (at least just put a stub tag at the bottom...stub implies need to tag). But without getting into it, just the template says "Please expand this article. Some suggested sources are given hereafter. More information might be found in a section of the talk page. (March 2013)". No sources where given...and certainly nothing put on talk.

2. The other one...sheesh. If you don't think it is notable, AFD or PROD or SD it. What is the point of a template for non-notability? (either the thing passes and then why deface it...or it fails and we get rid of it).

TCO (talk) 20:59, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to cut the box on notability. If this is dramatic (hope not), we can just take it to AFD. I figured AFDing something I don't think needs deletion would be more pointy and dramatic than cutting the tag. But otherwise, how can I ever get rid of the tag if I don't AFD it (and it is a drama to revert the tag).TCO (talk) 21:09, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]