Talk:Peeping Tom (Peeping Tom album)

The Who?

Wow. That is bizarre.

Yeah I saw it last night in Boston. They seemed so out of place.

Yeah, about the whole "booing" thing: I was at the Jones beach show, I wouldn't say that they were booed off stage. I mean, they finished their set and everything. That and there was alot of booing at the beginning but then it died down by the end.

Reviews

Why are people deleting the reviews from somethingFM and HotRockPlanet? Michael Greiner 01:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC) ôô[reply]

Contradiction

This article seems to be contradicting itself by calling Peeping Tom both, a solo collab album by Mike Patton, and an album by a band of the same name. Which is it, exactly? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ampc (talk • contribs) 00:15, 21 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

It is indeed both. -- Callmarcus 3 May 2007

I've noticed that there's no article for the artist Peeping Tom. That might be ok at the moment, but what happens when the next Peeping Tom album comes out? A lot of the information here should be on a separate article, Peeping Tom (band). We at least need a list of members. I'll try to do all this in a few days when I've got time. Pwrong 17:14, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These things (like Liquid Tension Experiment, Ocean Machine, Explorers Club (band) etc are generally referred to as projects and the lineup may vary a bit and is usually a mixture of people from different bands. Not a band, though some may eventually become bands. (And "trip hop", my arse! But genre-enforcers are too aggressive force to be fought on wp.) blades 16:14, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've already made the band article Peeping Tom (band). Liquid Tension has a separate article as well as articles for each album. I'd say Peeping Tom is a band with only one fixed member, like Nine Inch Nails.Pwrong (talk) 04:18, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Peeping tom cover.jpg

Image:Peeping tom cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV and Citations

marking this article for refimprove. So many direct quotes from living people. Where the citations for this artistic advertisement speak? WP:NPOV and WP:COI seem to be possible tags as well but let's give editors a chance to improve sources for a week or two and see what happens. Spectre9 (talk) 05:40, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]