Talk:Peninsula Shield Force

Arab world Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Western Asia

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Military history: Middle East Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Merger with GCC

This article seems a bit thin. Given that it's „the military side of the GCC” maybe it should be merged into that article (WP:MERGE). See discussion at Talk:GCC- ArnoldPlaton (talk) 00:30, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should remove the merger tag, as it seems the consensus is to keep it separate.--Aa2-2004 (talk) 10:51, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TODO: criticism of 2011 Bahraini intervention

i'm just adding these as notes for anyone (me or someone else) to do:

Bahraini citizens (refs: protestors' outright opposition: easy to find)
- interesting nuanced opinion by political party member: http://aawsat.com/english/news.asp?section=3&id=24663
citizens in Saudi Arabia, especially in and near Qatif, in street protests (done)
Iraqis in street protests (refs: see 2011 Iraqi protests or try news.google.com)
Iranian government (refs: easy to find)

Boud (talk) 20:51, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I support surely any developing and expanding for the article. But, i just have a small note, is these details are really important to be mentioned here? it seems for me that the article should take this event very summarized, since it supposed to talk about PSF usage not the protests itself, it may be better to keep these information in the main article of the protests --aad_Dira (talk) 00:19, 30 March 2011 (UTC).[reply]

i think that criticism of intervention by the PSF is a valid part of an article on the PSF - many articles have a "criticism of" section. There is some overlap with the "2011 protests" pages - for Bahrain and KSA - but i don't think that would be much of a problem. i agree that here, the protests themselves (calling e.g. for constitutional monarchy) are not (generally) the topic. Maybe just a few sentences would be enough. But to the degree that people are objecting to the PSF, IMHO that's notable to document here. The question of which article should have the "main" information on this particular type of info could also evolve with time: the PSF role might become a central issue to the Bahraini protests, or it might eventually become a minor issue. Boud (talk) 21:56, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]