Talk:Persona (user experience)
Appearance
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Adding section on Personas for AI
[edit]please explain to me, why my contribution is not accepted, if there is some problem, please discuss and not just delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kraljmatjaz (talk • contribs) 11:40, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- 1) It is refspam, as was explained on your user talk page and 2) It is WP:UNDUE weight to devote a section on this article to what amounts to one person's new pet system, which has apparently generated zero attention or follow on work from independent authors. MrOllie (talk) 11:49, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- but thats just the personal view of MrOllie, which I not agree. Can you please provide a justification how the emerging find of artificial intelligence is anticipated by personas and how human-AI interfaces are reflected ? Kraljmatjaz (talk) 14:25, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Köhler, T. (2001)
[edit]Did anybody check the reference of Köhler, T. (2001). Methoden der Analyse computervermittelter Kommunikation: ein kritischer Überblick; In: Frindte, W., Köhler, T., Marquet, P. & Nissen, E.: IN-TELE 99 - Internet-based teaching and learning 99. Peter Lang Verlag, Frankfurt am Main. ?
Even if this is argued in the publication of Köhler, it is not relevant to be mentioned as criticism here (IMHO) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kraljmatjaz (talk • contribs) 23:17, 26 April 2022 (UTC)