This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Peter Courtenay is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot07:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
When authoritative sources contradict each other, they should all be explicated and the differences described. Tout is outdated - so if the HBC and the ODNB give different dates, give both, saying who says what. Don't just delete one source unless it has been described as outdated. Ealdgyth - Talk19:47, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ealdgyth. If you want to add the page citations from Fryde back in with an explanatory note citing the differences between the dates given in Horrox and Fryde, please go ahead. I searched online to see whether I could find a copy of Fryde to verify the dates, but couldn't find one. The Horrox article in the ODNB seems carefully researched, and has been considerably updated from Tout's old DNB article, and I thought it was likely more reliable in this instance than Fryde, but I could be wrong about that. NinaGreen (talk) 20:29, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, they didn't conflict, they reported different information - his election date is given in Fryde, but Horrox is reporting the date that the pope provided him to the see. These are different things - the election doesn't involve the papacy, it involved his cathedral chapter choosing him. By this time in the late middle ages, the papacy was asserting the right to appoint most bishops but didn't quite have the power to overrule the chapters that often, so if the chapter's choice was acceptable to the papacy, they went ahead and provided (or appointed) the chapter's choice after getting word of the election. That's what appears to have happened here - the papacy provided him about 4 months after the actual election... both dates are relevant. Ealdgyth - Talk22:49, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
