This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Just a question. Is there some reason that Peter Dendle has a wikipedia page? He's a good Anglo-Saxonist, but he's still fairly new in the field, and there are many much more prominent scholars who don't have a wikipedia page (Andy Orchard, Roberta Frank, Katherine O'Brien O'Keeffe, John Niles, to name a few of the most important currently working). In fact, from searching around wikipedia, it seems like the only Anglo-Saxon scholars to have pages are the holders of the named chairs in Anglo-Saxon studies at Cambridge and Oxford. I think a little more representation would be good, but Dendle seems an odd place to start, and this seems more fitting for a department website than a general interest encyclopedia, unless all university professors are going to be getting wikipedia pages.
174.126.203.204 (talk) 07:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
