Talk:Piers Nash

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Article about Dr. Piers Nash is currently under construction. Feel free to add material, but please do not delete the article.

Admins: Google Piers Nash and you'll see the article has a long way to go - and he clearly passes the notability test. Rklawton 14:28, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wopumenita: Point of View questioned due to the actual author of this page being the one the biography is written about with no references to any of the information listed within.

A large number of references are noted. History indicates that content is not autobiographical. This is similar in appearance and content to may biographicals of living persons. No content appears to be in question. NPOV Neutrality marker removed. Suggest assignement quality scale GA?? Importance as mid or low?

Take a look on Google - everything checks out. No obvious reason for NPOV. As acceptable as other mid imp bios. Good publications, prestigious college etc. No awards at the Nobel level - certainly not high importance. I added a few more refs.