Talk:Pimp Juice (drink)

Food and drink: Beverages Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is within the scope of the Beverages Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[blue #1]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

This reads like a well writen article, it includes origins and contraversy over the drink. I think the deletion flag is unwarrented. Im not sure about the specific policy but even if it was more like a ad, i think it should be set for a normal vote based deletion. That would ensure objectivity. In summation, I believe this is much more than a product ad, even though you wouldn't catch me drinking it ZyMOS (talk) 06:10, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I only tag them for speedy delete. An Admin declined deletion so if its good enough for them. So I guess I was a bit hasty. Sting_au Talk 06:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Article went from creation to well written, referenced and with a table in less than two days. I agree that given the controversy, particularly the USA Today article, it passes notability. WLU (talk) 18:56, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks in no small part to you. It has certainly come a long way since I first tagged it with a speedy. I do a few newpage patrols when I'm in the mood, and I can only go on what I see first up. Sting_au Talk 21:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, I'm awesome. I will point out that even the first version, from what I can see, would have passed WP:N and WP:CORP based on the USA Today article alone in my opinion. WLU (talk) 21:37, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]