Talk:Popular Revolutionary Front for the Liberation of Palestine

Palestine Mid‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a logo be included in this article to improve its quality.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Untitled

PFLP was always recognised as a terrorist organizations - [1] : all factions and divisions of it, separatists and so on, were made clear by U.S they're still terrorist organizations in their eyes unless they renounce the violence option, which they didn't. anyway, even if you don't accept that (they were on lists, but assume they're weren't) since the people forming this fanction previously were in PFLP themselves, the former category stands anyway for this organization which rooted itself from a designated terrorist organization.Amoruso 17:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The logic of guilt by association does not function. Either you provide a source that says that US listed the group as a terrorist organization or you stop adding the category. Do we even have a source clarifying that there was a systematic designation by the US of terrorist groups in the early 1970s? The link you provided deals only with the EU list, a post-11/9 construct. Prior to 2001 PFLP was not designated as a terrorist organisation by the EU/EEC. --Soman 09:57, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They were regarded as a terrorist organization, and if you want we can just create former terorrist if you think designated is not a good word here. It doesn't even matter, don't know if you're trying to whitewash it or something, plain weird. Whatever. Amoruso 17:35, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The category 'Designated terrorist organizations' was created as an alternative to the category 'Terrorist organizations' to get away from the obvious POV problems involved with that category. The very point of 'Designated terrorist organizations' is that it can be clearly sourced who designates a group as terrorist, rather than arbitrary judgements. --Soman 08:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mad'ouk. Peer reviewers: TheBasher55.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review (4/13)

This article is clearly in the beginning stages of writing but does a good job in the opening paragraph about the division that formed the PRFLP. Though understanding that information is most likely limited for this group, There are some missing sections of information that need to be added to help readers better understand the group. There is explanation of why this group split from the original group but there needs to be a section of their particular ideology and why the PRFLP is a group. Depending on information availability, there should be a section on any type of involvement in a conflict or attack. Maybe something interesting to look more into is whether the group left any reminiscence to lead to the creation of another group or influenced any other group to formulate. The final suggestion would be to include a brief history of the conflict for which this group and other groups are fighting over so the reader understands why they were created. TheBasher55 (talk) 15:08, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]