Talk:Pordata

Portugal Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Internet

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

speedy deletion

Dear Sirs,

The page marked as Pordata as been selected for speedy deletion. This page was created by me, while working for the organization in question. The content of this page refers to a database, of free use. This database belongs to a Foundation without lucrative intents, that provides a public service to its society.

All quotes have been identified, and its sources listed in the bottom. Its fairly objective, and whenever an opinion is made about the subject in question, the author of those words is quoted. It is an enciclopedic article, and a very complete one if I might add. It overlooks every aspect of this database and lists its benefits. If anybody wishes to complete this article saying otherwise, he or she is free to do so, without any kind of correction from our part.

Personaly I'm a regular user of Wikipedia, and I've found it pretty helpful in the past. I'm sure you can understand my point of view, and again I ask you to reconsider. If you still insist in deleting this page, I ask of you only that you give me some more specific guidelines as to how one should write an article of the sort.

Once again I remind you that we do not have any financial profit (or any other kind of income for that matter) from this project. We just want to inform people of the tools and potential of using this especific statistcs database.

Hoping for a speedy answer. Best regards, Bernardogaivao (talk) 15:26, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can be advertising or promoting something without having a financial interest in it, and as an employee of this organization you do have a financial interest anyway. That being said I do not believe that the article is so blatantly promotional as to warrant speedy deletion and I have declined the nomination. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:58, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pordata.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Pordata.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:33, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]