Talk:Postage stamps of Italian Libya

Philately Low‑importance

	Philately portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philately, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of philately and stamp collecting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhilatelyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilatelyTemplate:WikiProject PhilatelyPhilately
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Libya Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Libya portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libya.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Postage stamps and postal history of Libya was copied or moved into Postage stamps of Italian Libya with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Untitled

I have taken the above material directly from the page "Postage stamps of Libya" (section Italian colony) of English Wikipedia. So, I don't understand what is the problem.--Oldsettler (talk) 20:50, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Oldsettler, you're fine. The Internet site mentioned by the Bot had copied the content from that article, so when you split it off, it only saw that you had created an article that matched content on another site. Removing the warning and a quick note here was precisely the right thing to do. Just one note in future, when copying content from one article to another, the license just requires mentioning where the text came from. A simple edit summary of "Copied from (article name), see that page for attribution" is plenty to satisfy the license. Thanks for your contributions! Crow^Caw 23:17, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]