Talk:Premium efficiency

Regarding my just recently added article describing premium-efficiency that has been tagged with speedy-deletion aka spam:

Premium-efficiency, or IE3, is a recently legislated EU-standard for power consumption efficiency in electrical motors that will come into effect in European countries in the year 2015. It states that electrical motors as of January 1st 2015 cannot be less effective than the IE3 level.

This is a fact that concerns industrial activities as well as the general public: the progression of emerging environmental consciousness on EU-level manifesting itself through this legislative directive is relevant for all people involved in and sensible about global trends towards reduced CO2 emissons.

The purpose of this article is to recapsulate both historical background to the environmental standards and future impact of recently enacted legislations, as well as giving general explanations of motor efficiency calculations. With this in mind, I can see no complications labeling this article as encyclopedic. In fact, I would be surprised not seeing this information brought public through Wikipedia, as it is aimed at people with interest in industrial manufacturing, motor engineering, EU-legislation, urban- and environmental development, bureaucracy and public opinion/influence.

Within this week, I will complement this article with a second piece describing development of specific IE3 motors. I think this will give you even more background to this EU-legislation and establish this article series as valuable content.

Kind regards, Fredrik Lindgren

Absonline (talk) 19:13, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:191:0026:0034:EN:PDF
http://ec.europa.eu/energy/efficiency/ecodesign/doc/committee/2009-03-27-circulators.pdf
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/eco_design/directive_2005_32.pdf
http://www.iec.ch/tiss/directives.htm
http://www.nema.org/gov/energy/efficiency/premium
http://www.automation.siemens.com/mcms/sites/en/energy-efficient-drives/legislation-standards-energy-efficiency/Documents/New-efficiency-classes-for-motors.pdf

Fredrik, Thanks for your work on this and Premium efficiency motors so far. For what it's worth, a speedy-deletion nomination does not necessarily mean spam: it covers many kinds of articles that are not deemed "encyclopedic." In this case, I would disagree and am glad that this article survived the process. On Talk:Premium efficiency motors, I have suggested that this article and that one could be merged, and that we need another article to talk about the motors themselves. Peter Chastain (talk) 14:14, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Chastain. I was a bit startled by the way the speedy-deletion was expressed, but I'm new here so thats why :). I'll try to deal with your ideas on the merging of the articles, which I think is a sound reflection. It demands some work through, so it wont happen immediately. Fredrik Lindgren 12:28, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Premium efficiency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:38, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Premium efficiency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IE4, IE5

Now exists also IE4, IE5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.25.136.142 (talk) 14:51, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly defined subject matter

"premium efficiency" is such a ridiculously undefined subject that Wiki probably shouldn't even allow it!

Insurers might use that term to define the efficacy of the fees, known as "premiums", to cover costs.

"Motor" is a term used medically in instances where motion is a factor,,, like muscles, nerves, etc. "Motor" actually means plenty of stuff, as a brief check of a dictionary will reveal.

Power is something autocrats crave and abuse, no physics involved.

Let's clean things up a bit. Tranzz4md (talk) 19:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]