Talk:Princess Nikki

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

Merge

This show is so minor, it should be merged with Nikki's section in the list of housemates. --Alex ^{(talk here)} 11:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. It's a bit early to declare it 'minor' - it could be a big hit. And merging it only to de-merge it later is a waste of time. --Mister Six 12:44, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. As per above it is to early to determine it as being minor. - Jezabelda 20:35, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. The show has not been aired yet and may be a success. However, it would be lost amongst the main article at the moment. Sahmraw 15:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This page has a whole two pages linking two it - one of which is the suggested merger page. --Al e x ^{(talk here)} 15:19, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The article's only been up for two weeks and the show doesn't air tomorrow. I think you should back down on this one. --Mister Six 16:08, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. For the reasons above, but also that this show is completely unrelated to Big Brother other than the fact that its star was in Big Brother, which doesn't link them closely enough. The only merge I'd consider (but would still probably oppose) would be merging into a new article: Nikki Grahame. - ^Рэд _хот 15:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I see everyone disagrees, I've removed the merger tag and we'll see how the show goes. --Al e x ^{(talk here)} 16:32, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

This article needs heaps more sources than it has now - a whole single one. _{J Di}^talk 12:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would help if Channel 4 created a site for Princess Nikki. Then we could add it as a main source of info - Jrgnet Talk 21:10, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Number of Viewers

Why is the number of viewers important information? Doesn't the article need sources? I'd put the cite sources tag on it, but I don't know how. Onlyabititalian 17:31, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you think something needs a source, tag the phrase or sentence. I don't see a point in using a {{unreferenced}} tag as it doesn't show other editors what they need to work on. Number of viewers gives people an idea of how popular (or unpopular) the show was, I guess. There's probably another reason for it, but if there is I clearly don't know of it. jd || talk || 17:36, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Princess Nikki. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070504220515/http://www.bothersbar.co.uk:80/weekendspecials/edgarjones.htm to http://www.bothersbar.co.uk/weekendspecials/edgarjones.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:13, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 10 external links on Princess Nikki. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:35, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]