Talk:Princetown railway station

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations / in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Help needed - layout[edit]

Page has a vertical gap before text begins. Seems to be caused by {{Princetown Railway}} template being placed immediately after {{Infobox UK disused station}} template. Also seems to be the case on other stations on the route (but sometimes mitigated to an extent by images at start of article). Not sure how to fix. Robevans123 (talk) 10:48, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Robevans123: Which browser do you use? I'm guessing that it's Internet Explorer. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:31, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - latest Firefox on Windows 8.1. Robevans123 (talk) 21:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

By that, I mean "No - latest Firefox on Windows 8.1"... Robevans123 (talk) 21:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Curious. I use Firefox 35.0.1 on Windows XP, but the top edge of the {{Princetown Railway}} template's border is roughly level with the paragraph beginning "Much of the old track formation now forms the route". I mentioned IE because that has a known problem where text is always pulled down by the upper edge of preceding floating boxes. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No - I mean at the very start of the article - the first line of text "Princetown railway station, opened in 1883 was.." seems to be one line lower than the top of the {{Infobox UK disused station}}. Have much the same effect (of varying heights) at the very top of the other stations on the line.

Ingra Tor Halt railway station would appear to be the exception (I think I randomly moved {{Princetown Railway}} a few days ago), but I think that effect only works if there is also a File: statement near the top of the source.

Don't think I've seen the effect elsewhere (but I'm not sure if I've seen a {{Infobox UK disused station}} template immediately followed by a railway route diagram. Robevans123 (talk) 22:10, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This edit should help. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorted! Thanks. Robevans123 (talk) 23:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]