Jump to content

Talk:Progesterex

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Progesterex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Hi! Can we find some reliable sources for this page? Maybe even more notable examples of where the drug "caused" sterilization? Here is my evaluation of the Progesterex article:

The lead for Progesterex started off good and contained the key aspects listed above. After the lead is where the problems begin. All the sections except two lack any form of citations, including a long, word-for-word section about an email. The tone of the article is note neutral and only includes one side of the story from an un-cited email. The citations that the article does have are not from reliable sources and include news articles as well as unrelated sources that do not speak directly about the topic. The lack of reliable information and notability ruins any possibility of the article being well written. According to the talk page, the Progesterex page has been rated as a Start-class and has very few edits, even considered for deletion in 2008 but was kept after discussion. Overall, I am very disappointed in the Progesterex Wikipedia page and hope it receives some serious revision. Tamashi2314 (talk) 05:42, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:37, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]