Talk:Prolonged exposure therapy
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 September 2020 and 25 November 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mmoreland01.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Prolonged exposure workbook.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Prolonged exposure workbook.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This page was excellent, but is somewhat out of date. To improve this page I would suggest adding more recent updates about prolonged exposure therapy. A good example could be found in Jama Psychiatry, a peer reviewed journal, in an article titled " Effectiveness of National Implementation of Prolonged Exposure Therapy in veterans affairs care" which talks about the effectiveness of Prolonged Exposure Therapy in a veteran treatment program and how both men and women greatly benefited from the program. Eftekhari, A., Crowley, J. J., Greenbaum, M. A., Karlin, B. E., Rosen, C. S., & Ruzek, J. I. (2013). Effectiveness of national implementation of prolonged exposure therapy in veterans affairs care. [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leearnoldml (talk • contribs) 23:03, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
References
- ^ JAMA Psychiatry, 70(9), 949-955. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.36
I'm a bit dubious about the motives of this article, particularly things like "Over years of testing and development, prolonged exposure has evolved into an adaptable program of intervention to address the needs of varied trauma survivors", which reads like a marketing statement; "Exposure-based therapies focus on confronting the harmless cues/triggers of trauma/stress", where the word "harmless" is used despite trauma triggers being anything but for sufferers; "clinically significant improvement in 40–75% of patients with chronic PTSD,[4][5][6]" whereas i could not find anything like this claim in the quoted material; etc. I'd like to see more study analysis rather than offhanded adulation of the therapy, which is not as generally acclaimed as is made out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Burpel669 (talk • contribs) 11:07, 9 August 2024 (UTC)