Talk:Propædia

If you have access to this resource, or if you need to verify a citation from this reference, check out WikiProject Resource Exchange.Resource ExchangeWikipedia:WikiProject Resource ExchangeTemplate:WikiProject Resource ExchangeResource Exchange articles

Books: Reference works

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

Levels and copyright

Suggest that this does not descend beyond two levels, which would be fair commentry. Rich Farmbrough 10:34, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

wp self-references

This article shouldn't compare Propaedia topics with wikipedia topics. I'm not sure if I can correct this without knowing what britannica calls se topics:

The corresponding Wikipedia topics are:
#Matter and Energy
##Atoms, Nuclei, ......
etc.

--Snargle 06:08, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have a printed Propaedia from 1976, if you still want to know what it says. Or has the issue been corrected by now? Aurodea108 (talk) 03:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Classification System

It could be mentioned that the classification system used by Propaedia is nearly identical to JHSI - Joel's Hierarchical Classification System by Joel Jones, which was supposed to categorize Internet sites in its early time 1993f. --193.17.243.4 09:28, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

According to Encyclopædia Britannica the encyclopædia uses British spelling. Why not follow it in this article? JIMp_talk·cont 15:44, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]