Talk:Prostaglandin F synthase

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 9 December 2020 by reviewer Robert McClenon (talk · contribs).

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge

This article should be merged with Prostaglandin-F synthase. The two appear to cover the same topic. Reba16 (talk) 15:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support. This article was only created in December 2020 while Prostaglandin-F synthase has been around since 2007, when loads of articles for specific enzymes were created, mainly as stubs with a biochemical bias. I'm not sure how Nixas93, who created this (generally better) version and the reviewer, Robert McClenon who accepted it missed the fact that the older article already existed. Anyway, no harm done and the combination will be much better than either alone. I'm not sure which title fits better with MOS:AT but probably this one, I think. Mike Turnbull (talk) 17:07, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - The answer to the question is that the procedures for reviewers do not include a name search for other articles with almost the same name. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Reba16 (talk) 17:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]