Talk:Proton Savvy

Malaysia Low‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Automobiles Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

What is KL-SG: 30 mins????? --Haniff 09:03, 30 September 2005 (UTC) (please reply or it will be deleted)[reply]

I would suppose he meant from Kuala Lumpur ( capital city of Malaysia ) to Singapore in 30 minutes travelling time ? By the way, dear ArmadillioFromHell ... why did you delete my postings on Proton Savvy AMT ? They are as real as ABC as I drive and own one such model Gee whiz, in just a maiden outing of some postings, ArmadilloFromHell seems so gung-ho to shoot down all my posts ? From cellfood, Dr Everett Lafayette Storey to Proton Savvy AMT car ... you are so trigger-happy to fire aways !?@#$%

I thought this is wikipedia ... the world's greatest free encyclopedia for the whole wide web to participate and join in ... to make it even bigger and better ... in terms of information freely flowing across the virtual air-space ? I must say you really have dampened my flying sorties and this comes as very much a shock and great dis-appointment to me indeed ...

Hello ... hello ... we are from the same universe or at least the same planet Earth I come in peace ... can we smoke the peace-pipe for once ceasefire for a lull moment before the bloody stains of all my thus far volunteer attempts at being an "author" get butchered, tortured and slaughtered by dear AmardilloFromHell have you not had enough of ants to eat for breakfast, lunch and dinner of late eh ? Make Love Not War ... Cheers and have a nice day then Have you had your hot cuppa as yet ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vince Lim (talk • contribs)

You do not know how to sign talk page comments and you do not know how to read an edit history. But those are small beer compared to the fact that you clearly have not worked out that this is an encyclopedia not a forum. It was I who removed you comments from this article - get real man - we do not put "YUMMY vroom vroom" in Wikipedia articles. -- RHaworth 17:41, 12

September 2006 (UTC)

WHY WAS THE TITLE CAR BUILD, SAFETY AND SECURITY DELETED ?[edit]

This topic on the Proton Savvy's build quality, security and safety was added in recently but was deleted by someone who was perhaps unhappy with the fact the ratings were below average. The person who deleted this has very shallow thinking in my opinion. Wikipedia articles are created to enrich knowledge of information seekers. It is only fair that all parties include all relevant information they know about a subject. If anyone can dispute the factuality of anything written within the mentioned topic, please bring it up here. Do note that all information has been provided with relevant sources of reference.

Any party with a appropriate reason to delete this article may bring up his/her reasoning here. RHaworth

"Some foreign automotive magazines also criticized hard plastic walling on the back of front seats as it could pose a hazard during frontal accidents if the rear passengers were thrown towards it."

This is factual incorrect. There are no hard plastics on the back of front seats. Hard plastic dash is the defacto standard for similar cars in its class ie myvi, aveo, picanto etc so why singled out this car for incorporating the similar material which are environmentally compliant. Why highlight only 2 negative reviews when they are other above par reviews from others - ie. the aussie reviews

The British car mags are bias as they consistently give poor reviews for french and non-jap cars.

Proof the antifans were here where the design of the bonnet was described like "toilet bowl" which was a blatant attempt to unfairly critise the car.

-autofreak

Attn : Autofreak If you feel there are some positive reviews you need to add in please do by all means. Do not delete this article. Though I'm not the author of the title "safety, build reviews', I fully support it and feel IT SHOULD NOT be deleted. Just because you don't agree with somethings do not delete it. We are not talking about other cars e.g. Myvi, Aveo here as the article is not combined. If you feel somethings on those topics should be added, add it there with relevant sources. Should you be able to cite any sources backing your claim, please put it up here. The author of this article had included relevant sources from reliable origins, please take note. Do realise that what you are doing can be counted as vandalism and I can report you to the wikifoundation having your IP Address blocked. Please be more rational in your actions for the good of this free encyclopedia. It also isn't appropriate and childish to brand the British car magazines as you did. Their reviews are widely accepted with your views not accounted for. I suggest you start your own Automag rather than mess this site up with all your views. We are not here to view other peoples reviews about a topic, we're looking for sourced facts -Thats Wikipedia.

AND WIKIPEDIA ISN"T SUPPOSED TO BE A CAR REVIEW SITE, it should be neutral and shouldn't be too judgemental, the review gives too much false impression, the added safety features was long awaited..there are many brands in the local market which doesn't even have single airbag for any of their baseline model lineup...if you have problem with that. I can complain to wikifoundation too, there was no attempt of defacing the site.

-autofreak

To be fair to all, the postive reviews should be added together with the original reviews which apparently was the work of antifans - the fans of Perodua myvi. It should be taken down in the meantime.

-autofreak

There's no harm in adding both pros and cons of a car as long it's sourced from a legitimate source. I don't own a savvy or myvi what so ever. Well you can see most other Proton pages and notice they have a write up on pros and cons, for example see the article for Proton Wira.

Agreed, article about cars should not be biased[edit]

I agree with you. An article about a car model should not be biased as it will spark fights among Wikipedians. We don't want this to happen. Yeah, I never own any of those cars, but I want to say this in order to be neutral.

Maybe there are defects on certain car models, but it doesn't mean that we are always free co give negative, destructive comments about them or the manufacturers may sue you in the court if they know your identity. That's just the same reason as why computer game producers don't include damage effects on cars in their racing games. 219.93.36.93 13:42, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]