Talk:Anglican Church of Rwanda

Christianity: Anglicanism Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as High-importance).

Africa: Rwanda Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rwanda (assessed as High-importance).

It is requested that an image or photograph of Anglican Church of Rwanda be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Rwanda may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Talk:Personal Ordinariate

Apart from the Traditional Anglican Communion, the article should really consider verifying whether groups within the Church of the Province of Rwanda have ever sought a similar canonical structure to the proposed personal ordinariates. ADM (talk) 18:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AMIA

Changes have taken place regarding the relationship between the Church of the Province of Rwanda and the Anglican Mission in the Americas. See [1]. I am not sure as to what is the best way to characterize the current situation. In any event, the reference to the Windsor report is probably unnecessary since it has been largely overtaken by events over the last several years. Eluchil404 (talk) 08:30, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I already addressed the question of the future of the AMiA in the article.Mistico (talk) 18:26, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]