An edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.
I would like to submit an improved version of the article for consideration. This represents a substantial body of work to bring the 4-sentence article up to a B-class(ish) article. Corporate 17:48, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Approved, draft moved over the existing article. DES(talk) 02:47, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
A requested edit by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The Further Reading section should not repeat references
The Public Interest Registry published a book on their history and the history of the .org domain, which I used to fill in the "citation needed" placeholder that was in the original draft. I felt it might also be good under a Further Reading header, but would like to leave it to an impartial editor to decide. Corporate 03:32, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Not done, because the Further reading section should not duplicate the content of the External links section, and should normally not duplicate the content of the References section, unless the References section is too long for a reader to use as part of a general reading list - WP:FURTHER. Any disagreement, please re-request. Thanks. Shaz0t (talk) 23:44, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Aww, ok - no problem. Corporate 00:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)