Talk:Puerto Rico Highway 103

Puerto Rico Low‑importance

	Puerto Rico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Roads: State highways / Puerto Rico Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Puerto Rico
	This article does not have a map. Please work with the Maps department to create and add a file for this article.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Wikipedians in Puerto Rico may be able to help!

On the National Geographic Map 103 is not a secondary road[edit]

It has only a black and white shield so a "Select Paved" road as National Geo refers to it but I really don't find it as a Secondary Road. Any ideas? --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 02:18, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you're going by this map of Cabo Rojo in the archives, where the PR-103 is shown with a Blue shield (secondary road), but that map doesn't match what's on the National Geographic map where the highway shield is black and white. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 11:13, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see the info in the other reference (in the article) but there's a mismatch, as mentioned before. But I'm no expert on this stuff... Just telling you what I see.--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 11:54, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A National Geographic map should be trusted as a reliable source of information on maps so shouldn't this be changed? --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 12:52, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing it.--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 00:33, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]