This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Macintosh, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
"Custom patches using Apple's Xcode template are always considered unsafe." Does this make sense? If apple's templates are unsafe, which ones are not Pstdenis (talk) 23:09, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
It could probably be better phrased, but it makes some sense. It is not Apple's Xcode template ..., but Apple's Xcode template... In other words, the ones people make themselves. Mlewan (talk) 19:42, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Chiming in here, at risk of some taintage: Apple's template for QC patches (included with xcode) has no provision for "safe" plugins. However, there are non-apple templates that can mark themselves as safe. One such template is the kineme one (I'm one of the developers of that template, hence the potential conflict of interest on my end) -- This reference: http://fdiv.net/2007/05/08/xcode-template-for-custom-quartz-composer-patches/ points to an extremely early version of this template. Feel free to clear it up as y'all see fit (or ask for more details :) Xtophyr Wright (talk) 21:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)