Talk:Quattro Pro
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
History after 1996
[edit]Quattro Pro is still commercially available and has had revisions in the years since 1996. Yet, the history in this article for all intents and purposes ends at 1996. This is inconsistent in comparison with the richer histories of other software program articles in wikipedia. Dogru144 05:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
What about the versions in the decade since then? Dogru144 05:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Programmers
[edit]Lots of programmers' names as red links. Are they likely to have their own articles soon or shall we change them to just text ? thisisace (talk) 12:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'd reckon if they don't have their own articles by now, they're not going to get one. So I'd recommend removing the wiki links from them. peterl (talk) 22:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Quattro Pro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060219103549/http://www.boeingcalc.com:80/ to http://www.boeingcalc.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:29, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Arts
[edit]Me 175.176.77.237 (talk) 06:03, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Borland Quattro Pro used the Co-Processor better to reach higher parallelism between x86 and x87
[edit]That is stated and explained in this article from PC Mag: https://books.google.de/books?id=YxFTezF9-sMC&lpg=PA1&hl=de&pg=PT333#v=onepage&q&f=false This information is missing in the article and should be added. 84.158.120.82 (talk) 00:49, 12 August 2024 (UTC)