Talk:The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide

	Australia portal The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Adelaide (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Hospitals Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

thank you

i mick hicks would like to thank all for my stay in er7 wednesday night all nurses and doctors were great thanks very much — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.200.222.146 (talk) 00:09, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070510180552/http://www.adelaide.edu.au:80/library/guide/med/menthealth/dibden.html to http://www.adelaide.edu.au/library/guide/med/menthealth/dibden.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Suspicious death on hospital grounds"

This poorly-written section was added by an IP user, who has just been blocked on 3RR. This incident is already mentioned in Wikipedia at Steve_Herczeg#Death, and in itself doesn't appear to be notable enough in this context to be repeated here, unless it's part of a series of similar events (such as other failures of the EPAS health records system, which was also criticised by the Coroner)- I propose that it be deleted. Bahudhara (talk) 05:29, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think this section should stay as it is a major event in the history of the hospital, however I felt it was not impartial and of low quality, so I have rewritten it to be more accurate and have included proper citation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.178.55.230 (talk) 07:09, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 49.178.55.230, "I think this section should stay as it is a major event in the history of the hospital" is just your personal opinion, unless it can be proved otherwise with an appropriate reference. While it was obviously a major event for the patient and his family, and attracted media attention, the Coroner did make some recommendations in his Report but these were only in relation to the then-new EPAS electronic record-keeping system and administrative procedures. In the context of this article, to prove that is was a "major event in the history of the hospital", you'll need to provide better evidence to back up that claim. Please note that Wikipedia is not a place to pursue personal grievances. Bahudhara (talk) 02:57, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since there has been no further discussion, I've just removed the section per WP:UNDUE. Bahudhara (talk) 12:11, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]