Talk:Quinnipiac University

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Quinnipiac University article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Connecticut High‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Buildings and landmarks: unsourced and laundry list boosterism. Propose deletions

The language itself is strong boosterism and the list of buildings is laundry list, undue. Then there is the problem of missing references. I propose broadscale deletions. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 12:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take that as a "yes, we agree." -- Melchior2006 (talk) 06:57, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Staff layoffs of 2014: Unsure if this is relevant enough. Propose deletion

While cutting a large number of staff can impact a university, hiring freezes and reductions in staff occur frequently at universities and businesses. Unsure if this paragraph is relevant enough to the university's history. I think this paragraph should be removed. Squiddyonwiki (talk) 10:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you; too much "news reporting" style, not encyclo-relevant. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 11:53, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted -- also, I added the 2020 COVID-19 lawsuit here. If you have any suggestions/opinions why this shouldnt be included let me know! Squiddyonwiki (talk) 13:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The COVID suit is utterly relevant because it has historical significance; alone the sum of money involved makes the suit relevant. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 13:45, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]