Talk:R160B (New York City Subway car)

Utter absence of acceptable citations

This article lacks verifiable citations. An anonymous train operator, allegedly posting on a railbuff message board, is not an acceptable citation.Raryel (talk) 17:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

yes R160 R train

there is r160 r train anytime i don't care what u say there is on it now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.8.187 (talk) 01:33, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

It is only there for put in, it isn't assigned to the R. We only put lines that the trains are assigned to, not necessary what they sometimes operate on. Just like how the R44 aren't assigned to the C but are operating on them right now. Also, stop being a ignorant.--208.120.142.8 (talk) 17:50, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

This IP posted three similar comments on the R160A page. On Wikipedia, we follow the datasheet that is linked at the bottom of every subway rolling stock article as our source for line assignments (we need a source). Nothing is changed until the datasheet says that something changed. Coasterlover1994^{Leave your mark!} 21:53, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

But on the data sheet it does say r160 r train —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.8.187 (talk) 22:58, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

I didn't specify which datasheet, I see. R160s are not assigned to the R, according to the JoeKorNer line assignment sheet and TA workers. Just because they sometimes run on the R (which the Datta datasheet affirms) does not mean they are assigned to the line. Hope this will help, Coasterlover1994^{Leave your mark!} 04:08, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

8953 on the r today

I saw a 8953 on the r and i was suprised how it looked now i really think there is r160 on the r —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.8.187 (talk) 23:18, 10 August 2010 (UTC)