Talk:R v Brown

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Cut and paste from Grievous bodily harm

I have moved the following passage here as it seems to have been added by someone who was unaware of this article.James500 (talk) 04:06, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Academic debate^[who?] has suggested that homophobia explains why the decision seems inconsistent with logic. The ruling may well not be followed in future cases, although it remains 'good' (i.e. authoritative) law.

Quotes under Criticism section

The Baker quotes don't seem to exist- unless I'm misreading them, looking at all the sourced articles I can't find the full quotes anywhere, some parts aren't even mentioned in the cited articles and none are as written here that I can see. I'd be happy if I'm wrong here though. Someone better than me do check it out! Ashesarecakestoo (talk) 13:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]