Talk:Radio:Active

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

What?!

Do these guys use wikipedia or something? They have a song called POV. I am being serious. --Metal of Head 16:12, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, they probably don't. Yes the song is called POV but there's no need for it to be linked/for an article to be made about it...yet. -- Stacey _{talk to me} 19:13, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Genre?

Somebody keeps changing the genre on Mcfly articles to 'rock'. Mcfly are not the slightest bit rock, pop rock is a perfectly acceptable genre that has been cited on other websites. Please stop changing it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.100.207.175 (talk) 17:56, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who keeps altering it, Mcfly are NOT rock please leave it alone. Christian1985 (talk) 22:11, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews?

I feel the 'Ultimate Guitar' review should be removed. It is NOT a professional review it was written by an unregistered site user. This does not qualify as professional this is simply the opinion of a non-professional reviewer. Please remove it. Christian1985 (talk) 10:20, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Radio:Active (DVD)

Although all mentions of the Radio:Active (DVD) article have been removed from this page, although the article does exist. I think it should either be linked from this page, or merged into it, or the page removed. There seems no point in having it as an orphaned article. Which is it to be? Rich257 (talk) 10:33, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the links (but I didn't create the page) because there's no information on the DVD at all apart from the release date. The official name isn't confirmed so the title of the article might not even be correct. I think the an article should be created when there's actually more info. -- Stacey _{talk to me} 23:21, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Radio:Active. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080924152710/http://www.emi.com.br:80/base_para_noticias.asp?c=2164 to http://www.emi.com.br/base_para_noticias.asp?c=2164

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]