Talk:Ralph Kiffmeyer

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Minnesota

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

City Pages is not a neutral judge on how a person is "chiefly remembered".--Echoshoes (talk) 03:17, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do an online search on Ralph Kiffmeyer. If it weren't for the attempt to outlaw adult toys, his single term in the Minnesota House would be completely forgotten. Can you find a source for anything ELSE he is notable for, besides that and being married to the Secretary of State? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blind carbon copy (talk • contribs) 21:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The only reason he is "notable" for that is your point of view. You are not giving a balanced representation of the issue, simply smearing with a negative column from a liberal paper. If you feel this is the only reason he should be in Wikipedia, then feel free to remove the listing.--192.236.20.73 19:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]