Talk:Ranaghat

India: West Bengal / Cities Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian cities (assessed as Mid-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Explanation of my edits

My edits of the article were mostly to make the article more compliant with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, which says that Wikipedia articles should not promote a particular point of view. This policy also excludes personal opinions, so your opinion that the city should have an engineering college, no matter how valid, is not suitable in the article. If you're able to cite reliable sources about a debate to add an engineering college to the city, then it would be fine to add the information. Describing a church as "beautiful" is also out of the bounds of the neutral point of view policy, because it's giving a personal and subjective opinion. There must be more to say about the church - why was it built in Ranaghat, is there any interesting history to it?

I've also removed information like train schedules because of the policy that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information; train schedules and times are too detailed for city articles. They can also change quickly, and the best place to document this change is in a company's train timetables, not on Wikipedia. Finally, I also made edits to fix some spelling and grammatical errors; fixing these errors gives an article a more professional appearance. Graham87 04:09, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My previous comments refer to the edits made before this one. I won't edit this article until I find a response here. Graham87 04:12, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ..

Hello guys from Ranaghat and around,

we are looking for ur comments and suggestions regarding the improvements of the article on Ranaghat. Please co-operate and write some valuable words.

To edit any page click at the top link 'edit this page' or para-graph-link 'edit' and add some recent info or delete unnecessary stuffs or Update something. For the 'Talk-page' click at the top + sign to add a new comment in the talk page. Cheers... --Jayanta 06:33, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notable people

I say that people in lists of "notable people" should have articles. No article means no listing. If somebody lacks an article but merits one, then the article should be created.

This edit suggests that 202.142.119.150 disagrees.

202.142.119.150, if you really want all those redlinked people (or non-linked people), then it's even more important that you provide references for each. For each, a reference for the claim of notability, and a reference for the claim of connection to Ranaghat. That's a lot of references. Are you going to provide them? -- Hoary (talk) 08:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]