From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Computing (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Capitalization of name?[edit]

Isn't it supposed to be 'Ratpoison' in the article headline rather than 'ratpoison'?

AfD Speedy Keep[edit]

This article has 8 different language translations ... why wipe out the English-language version? Clearly, its popular; just today, it came up on the guile mailing list. (talk) 17:32, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

And yeah, here is one more. --Duschgeldrache2 (talk) 15:25, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Please leave your comments on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ratpoison_(2nd_nomination). The closing administrator will not see them here. Thank you. Pcap ping 11:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

StumpWM started in 2003[edit]

I just stumbled upon an interesting message from Shawn Betts on the stumpwm-devel mailing list, dated 24 Sep 2003. (If you're surprised that StumpWM dates that far back, note that says the project was registered in July 2003.) Maybe we should use that message in the article? Cheers, CWC 10:49, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

subscriber-only article and Russian-language PDF[edit]

Those are two versions of the same article in a paper-based secondary source. --AVRS (talk) 21:48, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Ah. Then we probably shouldn't use it/them as sources.
For reference, the two cites are:
I did some Googling but found nothing citeable. (I did find a good article but it's at a personal website.) Cheers, CWC 04:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

New article for StumpWM?[edit]

Maybe StumpWM should have its own article.--Neo139 (talk) 23:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Maybe if it had independent references. At the moment, a separate article would probably be deleted. Op47 (talk) 16:51, 31 December 2012 (UTC)