Talk:Reach for the Dead

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Merger proposal

Since this is a 9 month old discussion in which the only contributors disagree with the proposal, I'm closing it so that we can all move on. — sparklism ^hey! 10:53, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This should be merged with Tomorrow's Harvest, since this article is not notable enough for WP:NSONG. Insulam Simia (^talk/_contribs) 17:43, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree WP:NSONG begings "Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject[1] of multiple, non-trivial[2] published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label. This includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries and reviews." This article has multiple references which discuss the subject. --194.176.105.138 (talk) 12:36, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree The article is properly sourced, is subject to multiple third-party reviews focusing on it and has reached an adequate length. I can see no actual reason for merging. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 21:10, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree - this is a fully-fledged article in its own right. It is well-cited and doesn't rely heavily on the parent article. There are far more singles on wikipedia with less information than this provides, I see no reason why this needs to be merged. 86.139.0.227 (talk) 09:57, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Reach for the Dead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130608181938/http://soundcloud.com/warp-records/reach-for-the-dead to https://soundcloud.com/warp-records/reach-for-the-dead

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:30, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]