This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is unfinished - from what I can remember of the book, the article only seems to cover about the first 10-20% of the story. Furthermore, does the article really need to go into so much detail? The definition of "synopsis" is a brief summary. This article is anything but brief. Arganoid 22:34, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
No, it covers the whole novel, perhaps you are thinking of a sequel. Yes, it is far too detailed. Czolgolz (talk) 17:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
I disagree with the claim that the plot section is far too detailed, and I for one think the Wikipedia tag for plot sections that are larger than the rest of the article is stupid. What is in a fiction novel other than plot? I do think that more about the history of the book itself, how well it sold, and how it was created needs to be added, but I do not think the plot section needs to be shortened. Comrade Graham (talk) 03:24, 25 March 2009 (UTC)