Jump to content

Talk:Renewable energy in Turkey/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Chipmunkdavis (talk · contribs) 07:13, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This is a very densely sourced article, but it does not yet meet the GACR. First of all, it is quite short, which is not disqualifying in itself but feels unexpected for a topic that seems quite broad and with a lot of potential. Most of the article is made up of a number of excerpts, which causes issues with some aspects of the GA criteria. With regards to the writing, it's actually much better than I'd expect from excerpts, but there are still areas of redundancy such as the wind and solar sections repeating each other. The use of excerpts also makes it more difficult to write the lead as a summary. The lead of this article is not summary of the rest of the article, but is instead full of unique information which should be discussed with a bit more space in the body. Items such as projections from single studies are likely undue in the lead of this topic. The non-excerpt sections towards the end of the article are promising, but they are very short, mostly one or two sentences. On the topic of broadness, it does feel like there is a lot that could be included, such as a historical overview of renewable development in the country, and current/former renewable energy policy. I note that some of the excerpted articles have similar sections. I also note that some information on these topics is already in the lead (including in its images), which can provide a start for the relevant sections. Renewable energy in Scotland, a current FA, has some variations on these sections. I hope to see this back at GAN at a later point, as it is an important topic. Best, CMD (talk) 07:13, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I messed up the timing somewhat by putting in too early as I had guessed the reviews of wind and geothermal would have finished by now. Still I don't think your review time was wasted as you made a lot of comments which will be helpful to me and I will certainly take a look at the Scotland FA. Chidgk1 (talk) 09:35, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]