This article was nominated for deletion on 17 December 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Evangelical Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Evangelical Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Evangelical ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityEvangelical Christianity articles
My primary concern with this article is that it is filled with information that doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. For example, I don't see the importance of the statement that "Their lawnmowers cut the grass at differing lengths." Indeed, the 'Early life' section could be reduced to a few sentences. The indiscriminate inclusion of non-encyclopedic information really obscures the issue of Mr. Hammar's notability.
Also, while I'm sure that the author and contributors to this page have acted in good faith, I'm a little worried that the article's author might be too close to Mr. Hammar, as some of the personal details in the 'Early life' section would probably be known only to close relatives (see WP:COI). For example, the full birthdates of his children and the details of Mr. Hammar's courtship are very intimate details, and I would be surprised if anyone outside of the immediate family knew them. Moreover, no attribution is provided for these details. (As an aside, in this era of rampant identity theft, it seems dangerous to post their full birthdates on Wikipedia for all to see.) Likewise, in the career section, there's an unsourced statement which claims knowledge of his subjective mindset ("Recognizing the importance of accounting and tax expertise in his work...").
I might take a stab at implementing these edits, but since they are quite substantial, I thought that it would be prudent to see what other people think. I envision this article being about one medium-length paragraph long, and even then, I would want to reassess Mr. Hammar's notability. Astro4686 (talk) 22:21, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I decided to delete some of the extraneous material. However, since there hasn't been a discussion yet, I'd understand if someone would prefer to revert my changes and then discuss what I'd like to see changed with this article. Despite the outcome of the earlier AfD nomination, I do not think that the article does a good job of clearly articulating Mr. Hammar's notability, mostly because it still reads like a resume. Astro4686 (talk) 07:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Now that much of the unnecessary information has been removed, I am becoming increasingly skeptical of whether this article fulfills Wikipedia's notability requirements for biographies of living people. I am tempted to renominate it as an AfD unless someone can make his notability clear in the text. The career section reads like a resume; it's poorly sourced and basically just lists his major achievements. I'd really like to see independent sources which describe why he is notable. Astro4686 (talk) 22:27, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Article has been extensively revised. I removed the COI and notability tags because the current version of the article has been heavily edited in the time since I added those tags. I am satisfied that the rewritten article no longer raises COI concerns. As for the issue of notability, I'm not convinced that Mr. Hammar meets WP:N, but I don't think that he is so clearly non-notable as to merit an AfD renomination. Astro4686 (talk) 01:10, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
