Talk:Rickrack
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
A note
[edit]Does this article need to exist, really? Does the world need to know about ric rac, something used for decoration and isn't really used today? It doesn't have any significance. A person would not need to look it up in an encyclopedia. Estridaldrea (talk) 21:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- It has gone out of fashion now, but was in fashion not that long ago, and is still sold and used. In describing previous fashions it could easily be a useful article to link to, were it improved. Loggie (talk) 15:18, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Still being used very much today and am surprised why you think your personal opinion about something should impact on whether it is featured here. BTW a person WOULD need to look it up in an encylopaedia which is how I found the page... jeanpower (talk) 12:12, 29 September 2012
I just purchased rickrack for sewing retro cocktail napkins and I was wondering about the history of the material...... I think that proves that there should be a better article about it.Dislokate (talk) 02:54, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
I definitely think this article needs to exist, but I feel it is very poorly written. What the author states as fact is either incorrect or opinion, depending on which statement you are examining. For example, rick rack comes in a variety of sizes, not just one. In trying to get technical or lengthen the article, the author stated as fact things that can be easily demonstrated as untrue. I believe rick rack was more popular in several decades prior to the 70's. As much as I am a Laura fan, I just don't think you can claim that the questionable television series based on her books made rick rack more popular than it was previously. HogRockingLinda — Preceding unsigned comment added by HogRockingLinda (talk • contribs) 00:29, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Great. Sofixit. Yes? KDS4444Talk 04:31, 18 December 2015 (UTC)