Talk:Robert Cahaly

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Merger proposal

This page should be merged with Trafalgar Group. This person is not significant aside from his involvement with the Trafalgar Group. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:24, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. While most of his work has been has been in his capacity as founder and CEO of the trafalgar group his work on campaigns (which needs to be expanded because his record is not exactly as stated), his arrest, and hopefully one day his accuracy and punditry need to be individually looked at and will be easily lost in merged record of the Trafalgar group. Jeffery Thomas 14:42, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sidenote: This tendency to want to continually merge articles in Wikipedia is problematic because it almost invariably leads to lower quality information or worse removal of information that may add a valuable perspective or insight to those looking for it. Jeffery Thomas 14:42, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]