Talk:Robert Simmon

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Astronomy Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?

I liked that you went into depth about one of Simmon's big achievements (Blue Marble). I thought you did a really great job explaining this concept. In your intro paragraph on Robert Simmon's, you include a lot of detail, which was also really nice.

What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?

I think maybe split up and add more sections to include his Education, Career, and Publications, in order to give a better understanding of who Robert Simmon's was and to organize your information better.

What’s the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?

Adding more headlines to organize the content that you provide.

Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!

I really like how you bolded something important that Simmon's contributed to and that you went into depth on this subject. I think that's something I need to add into my Wikipedia site that would make it more interesting.

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Great job!.

Sam-2727 (talk) 21:50, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]