Talk:Rock Steady Live

Rock Steady Live has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 25, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
March 5, 2010	Featured topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Gwen Stefani Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gwen Stefani, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gwen Stefani on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gwen StefaniWikipedia:WikiProject Gwen StefaniTemplate:WikiProject Gwen StefaniGwen Stefani articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rock Steady Live/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 00:53, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, this is a good article. The only issue I have is somewhat bureaucrautic: when quoting someone, the source has to be cited at the end of that sentence. So in the case of the critical reception section, sites have to be added for each quoted sentence where there are currently none. I went and did this so since it seemed silly to hold it for just that. As a result, I am passing this as a GA. Nice work. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 00:53, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]