Talk:Role of the United Kingdom in the War in Afghanistan (2001–present)

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Afghanistan

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles

United Kingdom

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles

Untitled

I haven't got time now to fill it out myself but i thought i had better create the page to replicate the Canadas role page, and as Britains role is more significant i thought it deserved its own page. --Boris Johnson VC 15:35, 23 September 2006 (UTC).[reply]

The Dutch MoD does not want to call it a war (at the moment, October 2006, the ISAF-mission). They speak about a security and reconstruction mission. If journalists ask them: is it war, or rebuilding and reconstruction. Rob van Doorn 01:32, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be more appropriate to change the name to "Britain's role in the 2001-present Afghan conflict"? Hut 8.5 10:50, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The British and American press seem to refere to it as a war, although i can't see that it makes that much difference--Boris Johnson VC 19:22, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Overlap with Operation Herrick

The Operation Herrick article sets out to covers all British military activity in Afghanistan since 2002. My concern is that this article, apart from the 2001 element (Operation Veritas), is a duplication. Unless I've missed something, this page should just be a disambiguation page to Operation Veritas and Operation Herrick. Greenshed 16:01, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good - there was never much to this article in the first place. Hut 8.5 16:53, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

but

There is a problem with reducing this article to the names of the military operations. The political question and debate about the wisdom or ethics of the intervention disappear. An article on the role of Britain in Afghanistan would be a good thing - the existing articles could limit themselves to military aspects. Johncmullen1960 18:31, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there really need for such an article?

It seems rather short and stubbish, let alone unencyclopedic. Shouldn't we just get rid of it Zobango (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:25, 23 June 2010 (UTC).[reply]