Talk:Rosie Webster

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Coronation Street, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Coronation Street and its characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Coronation StreetWikipedia:WikiProject Coronation StreetTemplate:WikiProject Coronation StreetCoronation Street articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Craig

Rosie did not break up with Craig after her and Sally nearly had a car crash. I am editing this out.

Fair use rationale for Image:RosieWebster.jpg

Image:RosieWebster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Triplets

This is probably a hoax as the the top two results for 'Rosie Webstar triplets' on Google are this article and John Stape. Google search. Lizzie Harrison 14:44, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Details

How much does the editor know about Rosie Webster? There is hardly anything here that points towards a knowledgable expert, is there!?! Rachypie12 20:13, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Windfall!?

Where's the storyline about John Stape giving Rosie 150K.Mind you it did only happen yesterday.(written Tues 16th June,Episode aired Mon 15th June.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.25.26.205 (talk) 16:41, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[1][2][3]RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 15:26, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[4] - Yahoo featureRaintheOne ^BAM 19:29, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rosie Webster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071024033026/http://www.corrieblog.tv/2006/04/so_whats_it_lik.html to http://www.corrieblog.tv/2006/04/so_whats_it_lik.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:11, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In-universe writing style

I've made a major edit to reduce the amount of in-universe writing and as a result limited the character's page to four areas: story line, characterization, casting, and reception.

My objective of the story line was to provide an overview of the character's arc on the show with minimal discussion of motivations or events that ultimately resolved with no major story changes. This was one person's attempt and I'm open to revisions, especially those that can be backed by citation of their significance given that the section is almost entirely original research in violation of Wikipedia:PSTS.

Characterization is intended to provide factual information about the development of the character from its actors, writers, and producers. At the moment it focuses on appearance, as that was the original material provided on this page.

Casting was simplified to discussion of who is playing the role during a given time frame and reduce extraneous quotes or background (such as the mention of a Radio Times crossover).

Reception was left largely unchanged.

Additional discussion is warmly welcomed. Vegantics (talk) 21:14, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]