Talk:Rowallan Castle

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scottish Castles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Castles in Scotland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Scottish CastlesWikipedia:WikiProject Scottish CastlesTemplate:WikiProject Scottish CastlesScottish Castle articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Military history: Fortifications / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Owners

There is a dispute over content that keeps getting added and removed from the 'owners' section, regarding an $800 fine for threatening or abusive behavior. One issue is that the user doing most of the deletion is user:Campbellkate, who may have a conflict of interest (the name of the person with the $800 fine is Niall Campbell, their wife's first name is Catriona, according to their Wikipedia Page). I originally thought the deletions were vandalism, but it appears to be an issue of potential conflict of interest. Additionally, many of the edit summaries appear to be intentionally misleading (e.g., removing the sentences referring to the fine, but stating that they were just fixing a typo).

More immediately important however is the question of whether or not this information is actually relevant to this page? My opinion is that the information does not belong here, regardless of whether it is factual and properly cited, simply based on it's tangential-at-best relation to the castle. I would like to see the information regarding the fine moved to the Niall Campbell page directly, if it is relevant there, but removed from this page. Any thoughts? Thanks. Paisarepa (talk) 01:49, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Would page protection help? - CorbieV ^☊ ☼ 19:37, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, looking over this in more detail, I see/recall now I'm one of the people who warned Campbellkate (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) for removing sources. If that user does it again, they're getting blocked. But we now have IPs doing similar edits, so I think semi-protecting the page is probably best. I'll look at the logs and protect it for a period of time to give established users some time to sort this, source it, and fix the POV issues. - CorbieV ^☊ ☼ 19:54, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for one week. If disruption resumes at that time, ping an admin to block disruptive editors and/or extend protection. I also reverted back to what looks to be the last stable version by an established editor. If this is The Wrong Version, feel free to rectify. - CorbieV ^☊ ☼ 20:03, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sirs I wish to write to draw your attention to a disputed insert under the “owners” section on Rowallan Castle. There is a vendetta being waged against the owner where although the facts are not denied, they are still being considered by the Criminal Cases Review Committee. This is also a family business and would question if this information is relevant to the history of the castle. The indexed references are also incorrect and maybe, if to be included at all, it should be in the micro history section? Yours faithfully Niall Campbell — Preceding unsigned comment added by CorvetteBastian (talk • contribs) 14:33, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]