Talk:Russia in the Eurovision Song Contest 1995/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 09:32, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):

b. (citations to reliable sources):

c. (OR):

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):

b. (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Time to get rid of this old nomination! --K. Peake 09:32, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The songwriters are not directly sourced anywhere in the body as they should be
Wikilink Philipp Kirkovov in the lead
"to select Russian entrant." → "to select the Russian entrant."
To avoid the lead being too cluttered, you should start a new para at Vocal Band
"due to the band members being" → "due to the members being"
Wikilink music video
I think it is worth noting that the placing was their worst result
Everything's done - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduce RTR and ORT by their full names per this being the first mentions in the body
"which will represent Russia" → "which would represent Russia"
Everything's done - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilink Philipp Kirkorov on the img text
"jury came to" → "the jury came to"
Everything's done - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Table looks good!

"due to the group's members inability" → "due to the members' inability"
Wikilink Philip Kirkorov
Wikilink music video
"to the public on 30 April 1995" → "to the public the next day"
Everything's done - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Img looks good!
Pipe previous year's contest to Eurovision Song Contest 1994
"participation in 1994 contest" → "participation in the 1994 contest"
"didn't participate in 1994 contest." → "didn't participate in this contest."
"in 1994 contest," → "in the 1994 contest," but where is this 17 part sourced?
"Philipp Kirkorov took part in" → "Kirkorov took part in"
"on 8 and 10 May," → "on 8 and 10 May 1995,"
"wearing white shirt and" → "wearing a white shirt and"
"was the Russia's worst placing" → "was Russia's worst placing"
"had won the contest;" → "had emerged as winners;"
"the Russian singer."" only keep inside speech marks if this is a full sentence per MOS:QUOTE
Everything's done - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"for 1995 contest," → "for the Eurovision Song Contest 1995," since this is a new sub section
"to the ten highest-ranking songs" → "to the 10 highest-ranking songs" per MOS:NUM
"assembled 16-member jury panel," → "assembled a 16-member jury panel,"
Pipe Lora Kvint to Квинт, Лора Геннадьевна
Everything's done - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Table looks good!

Copyvio score looks phenomenal at 4.8%!!!!
Why is EBU only in brackets on ref 1?
Removed - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fix MOS:QWQ issues with refs 2 and 18
Can you explain in more detail what needs to be done, because I tried to fix it, but it got worse and messy. Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ref 4 is government owned, so are you sure about the reliability?
Removed - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fix MOS:QWQ issues with ref 7 and what exactly makes this source reliable?
Removed - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What is ref 8 and why is it reliable?
Removed - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pipe Raidió Teilifís Éireann to RTÉ
Done - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Is ref 20 WP:USERG?
I don't think so. I looked through this site and found no evidence that this site is self-published. - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On hold until all of the issues are fixed; this should not take very long! --K. Peake 17:14, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging the nominator: {{u|Danilmay}}, since this article has not been change since this review has been on hold for 6 days now. — VAUGHAN J. (TALK) 20:24, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

K. Peake, I've made almost all the changes you've requested. Only I had one question (added above). Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Danilmay MOS:QWQ issues are when you have used double speech marks inside reference titles; replace with singular ones ('). --K. Peake 15:17, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Pass now, this is totally fine! --K. Peake 19:16, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]