Jump to content

Talk:Rutellum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How was the fossil described?[edit]

Obviously not as a dinosaur.--Gazzster (talk) 16:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How can a pre-Linnean name be a nomen nudum? FunkMonk (talk) 10:51, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Implicatum or impicatum?[edit]

On the internet I read that maybe it was actually impicatum (without an l) and not implicatum, and this means a completely different thing in Latin. Can someone confirm it from a reliable source? 2A02:AB8C:4021:4780:6972:FAFD:8ACF:9246 (talk) 20:02, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, that's the spelling in Lhuyd. Good catch. Ashorocetus (talk | contribs) 04:30, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did Delair & Sargeant (2002) actually ressurect the genus Rutellum?[edit]

ref = Delair, J.B., and Sarjeant, W.A.S. (2002). The earliest discoveries of dinosaurs: the records re-examined. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 113:185–197. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.32.34.85 (talk) 16:37, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]