Talk:Rutgersella

Tree of Life Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetic tree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Retallack's claim and further scepticism[edit]

"The fossils are pyritized; some internal chambers are filled with chalcedony, so that they are preserved along with basal rhizines. According to Retallack, these observations suggest affinities with lichens, and perhaps the fungal phylum Glomeromycota.^[1]"

Though it could be interpreted that this organism had "rhizines," many animals are capable of thalloid or rhizoid structures (e.g. Anthozoa, Bryozoa, and some Porifera), and few lichens grow in with seemingly determinate or even superficial bilateral or glide symmetry. This organism could have been an aberrant form of sea anemone, or possibly an unusual sponge. Perhaps even a member of the proarticulata, as Retallack himself suggests, but just not whatever his... lichen or glomeromycete interpretation of the Proarticulata seems to be. Cheers, and sorry for the edits to other articles. As firmly as I stand on the idea of post-Ediacaran/Vendian-biota-type organisms surviving, the frequent lack of further citation or exploration of other ideas aside from that of Retallack's must be addressed, and with the cholesterol tracing experiment performed by Bobrovskiy et. al. upon Dickinsonia, perhaps more experimentation along those lines should be undertaken to at least spark more vigourous, realistic debate and insight into the nature of these life forms. 74.96.143.21 (talk) 19:02, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

^ Cite error: The named reference Retallack2015 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[Retallack2015-1] Cite error: The named reference Retallack2015 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[1]