Talk:SM-9
Appearance
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 1 April 2017. The result of the discussion was redirect to Sten#Cellini_Dunn_SM-9. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SM-9 redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copied text
[edit]I've deleted two sections entirely because they almost exactly match a patent application. Here's the Earwig comparison for reference. It may be that patent applications aren't copyrighted, but it seems wrong to copy the text in full anyway, especially without referencing. Mortee (talk) 20:59, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Redirect-Class Firearms articles
- NA-importance Firearms articles
- WikiProject Firearms articles
- Redirect-Class military history articles
- Redirect-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- Redirect-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- Redirect-Class South American military history articles
- South American military history task force articles