Talk:SQF Complex
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Update
[edit]Update of fire status and property loses Seki1949 (talk) 20:17, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Added update on impact on Sequoia Groves Seki1949 (talk) 21:11, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Updated and fixed links Seki1949 (talk) 19:02, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Undiscussed page move
[edit]I object to the undiscussed page move - this was a Complex, not a singular fire, and it was not called the "SQF Lightning Complex," rather it was simply the "SQF Complex." See InciWeb. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 22:54, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Revert "homes" back to "cabins"
[edit]Almost everyone in the area uses the term "cabin" to refer to their property. I had a cabin in the area (unfortunately lost in the SQF); "cabin" is the near universal term used for the lost structures. Seki1949 (talk) 06:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- WikiProject California articles
- Stub-Class Disaster management articles
- Low-importance Disaster management articles
- Stub-Class Wildfire articles
- Low-importance Wildfire articles
- WikiProject Wildfire articles
- Stub-Class Weather articles
- Low-importance Weather articles
- Stub-Class Drought and Wildfire articles
- Low-importance Drought and Wildfire articles
- WikiProject Weather articles